The Al Qaeda terrorist attacks on the WTC in New York, and the war in Iraq remain very actual themes in the news.
Can we use our diagram to say something about it?
There was a first terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 1993.
We can use that as the starting point in the diagram.
1993 was a #9 year in the new cycle that started in 1984.
From the first WTC attack by Al Qaeda in the 1993, we move forward in the diagram and the first square year we encounter is #13.
That is year 1997, when no major terrorist events happened.
Next we go on to year #17, which is opposite to our first point #9.
This is the year 2001, when of course the second massive attacks on the WTC took place.
Moving further in the diagram we get to year #21.
This is the year 2005, which saw large scale attacks on the London public transport system.
These were the largest attacks since 2001.
The next key year will be #25.
That is 2009.
So we can expect something that year, but we don't know what.
We could see another large scale 'event', but it can also mark end of the war in Iraq, since that war was started with these terrorist attacks as the main casus belli (justification for war).
Conclusion
From the given examples we can see how important key years in history, often fall exactly on the square lines based on the year of an earlier related event.
It confirms what Gann had observed in his research on stock market charts 100 years ago.
The key is in using the right year to start the count, and it seems to work quite nicely by using the Jia Zi years as 0 point.
We have used the very same diagram in all given examples, and it matches so often that it is almost scary.
How or why this works is not so easy to say.
Is it a kind of “structure of time”?
The phenomenon of “time” is still one of the least understood by our modern science, so who knows?
http://www.fourpillars.net/
No comments:
Post a Comment